During the 2017 holiday season, I got a great deal on the Best of Warner Bros. 100 Film Collection. Diane and I haven’t seen most of these movies, but we are committed to watching one a week and writing a short review.
We begin with 1927’s “The Jazz Singer”, a fitting beginning to our tour of cinematic history. Known as being the first feature length film to feature both a synchronized musical score and some synchronized speaking, “The Jazz Singer”’s historical significance is its position at the end of the silent film era and at the beginning of “talkies”. History aside, is it still good?
Diane and I agreed: it was an interesting movie. The music is beautiful. The songs, however risque they may have been for the time, have an old timey charm that still resonates even if the novelty of hearing them in a movie theater does not.
One thing that remains fresh about the movie even today was its focus on Jewish culture and Jewish identity in a new world. Neither Diane nor myself have had much exposure to Judaism, so seeing a Jewish family be at the front and center of a movie as culturally significant as “The Jazz Singer” was kind of uplifting. Judaism and Jews in cinema are not unheard of – I personally loved The Coen Brothers movie “A Serious Man” – but the way the movie presents Jewishness didn’t seem to bother with how the audience might see it. There were no explanations or exposition trying to expound upon Jewish culture for non-Jewish moviegoers. There also was not any attempt to obfuscate it either. This was a movie about a Jewish man and a Jewish family wrestling with identity and it executed that story very well.
However, as far as stories go, we both agreed that “The Jazz Singer” is about as cliche as you can get. Without more context, I am unsure of how often this trope was used even back in 1927, but the whole “child doesn’t want to follow in a parent’s footsteps and is exiled for it” plot made the movie feel paper thin. Devoid of its technical achievements and beyond its historical significance, no one should watch this movie for the plot but at least the acting and music largely makeup for it.
I did have one major concern of my own: the mother and son relationship. For one, it was creepy. I imagine it was okay at the time to kiss your mother on the lips, buy her diamond jewelry, and want to whisk her away to Coney Island where you promise to kiss her some more. It didn’t help that the lead actor with his silent film, over-the-top white makeup, looked like an even creepier Ted Cruz.
Finally, we arrive at the real elephant in the room: the blackface. I have heard of this movie before, but neither of us were aware going in that we would so quickly see some good ole fashion racism. The scenes with the lead in blackface singing about his ‘mami’ made Diane uncomfortable, but I thought they were hilarious. We did both laugh when, in full blackface, the lead actor opined about troubles facing his race (meaning the Jews).
All in all, we both feel better having seen “The Jazz Singer”. It was our first real exposure to a silent film and it is plain to see how important this film was at the time and how important it still remains. I doubt either of us ever watch it again, but if you are curious about movies and their history, then “The Jazz Singer” shouldn’t be missed.
- “The movie begins … with an overture?”
- During the movie’s opening establishing shots of New York: “I think I saw a black person!”
- “Is he putting on blackface?” “Yes dear, yes he is.”